Previous Page       Home

 

 

 

FAQ - Questions and other Aspects 

 

1. Why did you write this paper?

2. When did you become aware of Mozart's heavy use of this phrase?

3. What is your opinion of this phrase?

4. Was Mozart aware that he used this phrase so often?

5. Why did Mozart use this phrase so often?

6. How many examples exist of Mozart's use of this phrase?

     7. How many pieces by Mozart have you heard?

8. How many pieces by other composers have you heard?

9. How can I locate more examples in Mozart’s music?

10. How can one determine if it exists in the works of other composers?

11. Did other composers use their own "trademark phrase"?

12. How does this "trademark phrase" information enhance my knowledge of music

      in general or Mozart in particular?

13. Did Mozart use any other trademark phrases? (K.608 - musical metaphor).

 

 

Q1: Why did you write this paper?

I wrote this paper and created this website to let Mozartians and others know about the

Trademark Phrase as well as its possible significance. I discovered years ago that apparently

 no one was aware of the MTM.

 

The impetus for it was an occasion when someone with a heavy background in music,

including theory and harmony, was playing a few bars of K.421 (a string quartet) on the

piano, and remarked that Mozart then composed "the most amazing chords". At that point,

he played the 2 chords comprising the trademark phrase. The entire phrase is more

complex and far more interesting than just 2 chords, but the MTM is woven into the

last 2 beats of the phrase, and it was the MTM he was referring to as being "the

most amazing chords". (The music played is listed here as example A11).

 

I commented that Mozart's music is riddled with that phrase. Didn't he know that? 

Hadn't he ever read it somewhere? The answer was No.  I was very surprised.

Therefore I decided to write a paper about it, and eventually published it on the

web.

 

The MTM is important since it's so deeply embedded in his music, and probably represents

Mozart himself, at times. The MTM is part of who Mozart was, and represents his music

to a considerable extent. Being unaware of the MTM is to miss a significant piece of

Mozart's music and his persona. It is probably the nucleus of his music and his personality.

 

 

Q2: When did you become aware of Mozart's heavy use of this phrase?

I’ve been aware of its frequent usage in Mozart’s music since the early 1960s.

 

 

Q3: What is your opinion of this phrase?

The phrase is interesting, complex, compelling, and rewarding. It gets my attention in the way

Mozart used it. But as good as it is, some of the harmony surrounding the phrase is even

more interesting than the “trademark phrase” itself. However, it is rather fascinating that 

Mozart found so many different ways to weave this phrase into his music, and that

he invented at least several variations of it. He repeatedly picks it up, reshapes it, and

puts it back down in a seemingly endless variety of musical thoughts.

 

At times, it appears to exist as a period at the end of a sentence. Occasionally, it seems to be

written almost as an afterthought. But sometimes the music actually revolves around the theme

of the MTM, showing us how important the phrase must have been to Mozart. The opening of

K.594 (example A6) is such an example. The entire point of the opening seems to be to arrive

at measures 5-7 where a complex version of the MTM is played, consisting of 33 notes.

There the MTM is not simply "2 chords". The music is funneled into a massive resolution of

the preceding notes. It is part of the machinery of the music, and forms the REASON for the

existence of the first 7 measures. It's the music's goal and destination. It's the "Mount Everest"

of what feels like "the long, difficult trip", even though the trip is only a few measures.

 

In the case of example A11 (K.421 - one of the Haydn quartets), a different feeling is evoked

where the music feels as if it's "going home" at one point (measures 28-30 of the Menuetto),

and home is so comfortable with its familiar MTM phrase to relax in. Since chamber music

was played in the home, the phrase fits in perfectly with the performing location.

 

Another aspect of the phrase is that of solving a problem. The first chord (the Italian 6th)

is the problem, and the 2nd chord is the solution or resolution. So the problem is presented

and solved over and over by hearing the MTM many times. But to make matters a bit

more interesting, the 2 chords are often dressed with additional notes, making the "problem"

and resolution slightly different in many cases. Added to that body of problem/resolution

material are the variations on the MTM. The variations introduce an entirely new set of

harmonic problems and resolutions, but still with satisfying results.

 

We know that Mozart will throw in these "problems" in his music, when possible, but we

also know that he will always solve them to our satisfaction. It is the foreknowledge that

a stress/relief pair will probably show up, and that relief from the stress will always be

supplied, that gives us additional confidence and assurance when listening to Mozart

(among other reasons for enjoying it).

 

Other composers may have done similar things, but Mozart was smoother and more

reassuring. And his use of using the same problem/resolution in varied forms (the MTM)

is probably unique. We expect to hear it, and we usually do. It's like seeing an actor's

name listed in a movie ad. We know that his role will be different (usually), and his lines

will be different, but we look forward to a certain style of performance from him.

So it is with the MTM. Many - if not most - of Mozart's pieces contain the MTM, and

we can look forward to hearing it being presented in novel but familiar ways.

 

But most of the time, the MTM feels like the logical conclusion of a musical thought,

and it feels familiar, new in some way, and always very satisfying.

 

 

Q4: Was Mozart aware that he used this phrase so often?

Undoubtedly, yes. There are 2 reasons for stating confidently that Mozart was aware he

used this phrase so often:

1. Mozart was not an "unconscious" composer. He had  to create, evaluate, integrate, and

often polish everything he wrote.

When you consider his phenomenal musical memory, and his high state of "musical

awareness," it would be a contradiction in terms to say he wasn't aware of how often

he used it. Mozart would then not be Mozart.   

 

2.Considering the variety of ways he used the phrase, as well as the variations" on the phrase,

he had to be acutely aware that he was using and re-using that phrase, and creating variations

on it. You can't create a variation on something that you don't remember.

 

 

Q5: Why did Mozart use this phrase so often?

I don't know. I presume he liked it, otherwise he wouldn't have used it. It's possible that he

decided to stamp his compositions with a rarely used phrase in order to create a

"musical trademark," but more likely, I think, he simply considered the phrase to be

"good music with possibilities for variations."

Even though the basic phrase is only 6 notes, it has a complex and interesting sound to it.

Similarly, Mozart was a complex and interesting composer, so he may have identified this

phrase with himself and his music. It may have been a compact way of expressing who he

was and what his music was.

 

 

Q6: How many examples exist of Mozart's use of this phrase?

      I don't know, but I would think it could number in the hundreds. The variations would

      add to that total.

 

      In addition to the examples cited, the phrase can be found:

      * In the first movement of the Jupiter Symphony in a passage in a minor modulation,

         where the key changes from C minor to G major.

      * It’s in the 2nd  movement of the 39th Symphony, K.543 – at least twice.

      * It’s in the opera Figaro  in Barbarina’s cavatina, number 23 ("L’ho perduta") at measures

         14 and 15 (at  “...ah chi sa dove sara?”), as well as in the last measure of the number.

      * It’s in the first  movement of the Coronation Piano Concerto, K.537.

      * It’s in the opera Idomeneo in the chorus “O voto tremendo”.

      * It's in the concert aria Ch'io mi scordi di te?, K.505, written for Nancy Storace to sing

         and Mozart to accompany on the piano.

      It’s quite common in Mozart’s music.

      It can even be found in the last notes Mozart wrote not long before he died, in this case,

      with 1 intervening chord (A-F-D-A):  In the Requiem, in the "Lacrimosa," at the words

      "homo reus" in bar 8. For the words "homo  reus", we have the following 4 chords for

      the chorus (SATB, key of D minor):
     
        B-D-G-G' ---> Bb-F-D-G# ---> A-F-D-A ---> A-E-A-C# 
          ho       -      mo             re      -    us.
  Chord   1               2              3            4


     
The trademark phrase from the preceding 4 chords, as highlighted in yellow,

     compressed and interpolated.


         
   Bb-D-G# --->  A-C#-A   with the D minor chord (3) intervening.      

        Italian-6th    Modified-major-triad                                 

  Chord  2a            4a

 

  Click speakers to hear MIDI sound clips.

 

                    MTM, chords 2a and 4a derived from "homo reus" 

                               

                    Lacrimosa - Homo Reus - Chorus

                                

                        Lacrimosa - Qua resurget - Chorus

                            

                         Lacrimosa - Beginning through Homo Reus

                              

                (Text: Lacrimosa dies illa, qua resurget ex favilla judicandus homo reus)

 

    For illustration purposes of the trademark phrase, the F has been removed from the

      first chord (not needed), the E has been removed from the second chord (not needed),

      and the C# has been interpolated between the two As. 

      This is the compression and interpolation which is often necessary to extract an MTM,

      but none of the notes have been changed.

 

     The intervening minor chord (A-F-D-A) is a significant event, not an intervening flourish

      progressing to a  major chord (A-E-A-C#).

 

      This phrase is listed as an example of a variation on the trademark phrase, in Mozart's

      last work (a normal MTM with an intervening chord)

  

      Note: It is believed by some Mozart scholars that the Lacrimosa was not the last number

      in the Requiem Mozart worked on, since he had other, more creative tasks to do in
      the piece, first. However, it is apparently among the last numbers he worked on
      before expiring, and certainly the most visually depressing, with the score
      breaking off into empty music paper after 8 bars.

 

      It may also have been the last portion of music Mozart performed, purportedly having sung

      part of it with friends at his house, only hours before he died. According to one story,

      after singing the opening notes of the Lacrimosa, Mozart began crying uncontrollably, 

      and was unable to continue singing the rest of the Requiem with his friends.

      11 hours later,  he was dead. We don't know if this story is true or not:  he may have been

      too sick and weak to do any singing. Since his condition apparently vacillated somewhat

      between having good days and bad days, it might be true. We will probably never know.

 

      But as we hear the simulated teardrops falling in the music of the Lacrimosa, and even

      a variation on the MTM, it is certainly possible that the story is true. With the MTM

      in the middle of all this sorrow, one could almost say that the music was crying for

      Mozart - as well it should.

 

       

                

        A portion of Mozart's autograph score of the Requiem.

        Measures 6-8 of the unfinished Lacrimosa.       

        We see the words "ex favilla judicandus homo reus"

        for SATB, and an additional Basso line (instrumental) at

        the bottom.

        ("Huic ergo parce deus" which follows was not written

          by Mozart.)

 

 

 

Q7: How many pieces by Mozart have you heard?

My Mozart collection numbers over 500 unique pieces (500+ Köchel numbers) – mostly

recordings, but also MP3's and MIDI's, including the earliest works, his first composition, his

first choral composition, etc. I’ve listened to all the pieces at least once over the past 50 years.

 

 

Q8: How many pieces by other composers have you heard?

I haven’t counted the number of pieces by others which I’ve heard or own, but in addition

to a large Mozart collection, I have the usual collection of music by other composers such as

Bach, Beethoven, Brahms, Hayden, Handel, Vivaldi, Purcell, Chopin, Ravel, Debussy,

Wagner, Hindemith, Bizet, Verdi, Mendelssohn, Tchaikovsky, Prokofiev, Strauss, Copland,

Orff, etc, as well as many “non-classical” pieces (jazz, blues, music of the 1940s and 1950s,

the Beatles, Abba, some New Age, some show tunes, Brazilian dance music, the marches of

John Philip Sousa, German drinking songs, etc). I have 1 piece by Salieri (it's not bad),

and 1 piece by Mozart's son (Franz Xaver Mozart, Sonata for Cello and Piano, Opus 19,

in  E Major - it's not bad, either ).

 

I also have music by Sussmayr and Mozart's pupils. The MTM can be heard in the music

by his pupils, though not in the others (except for some music by JS Bach).

 

It's almost unique to Mozart, and certainly no other composer used it as often.

Some composers - perhaps many composers - apparently never used it.

 

 

Q9: How can I locate more examples in Mozart’s music?

Listen to the music, or write a computer program to search for the phrase - if Mozart’s music

has been computerized. But I wouldn’t recommend that anyone listen to Mozart with the sole

purpose of trying to locate this phrase (other than as a short experiment). Doing so would

probably diminish the listening experience considerably, focusing on one tree instead of the

forest. If you hear it, enjoy it.

 

 

Q10: How can one determine if it exists in the works of other composers?

Listen to the music, or write a computer program to search for the phrase - if the world's music

has been computerized.

 

 

Q11: Did other composers use their own "trademark phrase"?

I don't know the answer, but an expert in music could probably supply the answer to that

question.

It would probably be accurate to say that many composers have a "trademark sound" or style,

such as Bach, Chopin, etc. But an intentional or unintentional trademark phrase would be a

different matter.

 

 

Q12: How does this "trademark phrase" information enhance my knowledge of music in

general or  Mozart in particular?

Knowing this "trademark" information can shed some light on Mozart, his music, and one

aspect of his method of composing. If the trademark phrase represents Mozart, at times,

then we can "know" Mozart, to some degree, by appreciating the phrase,

 

 

Q13: Did Mozart use any other trademark phrases?

Not that I am aware of. 

However, Mozart once used a musical metaphor to represent an entire piece, and this

point relates to his use of the trademark phrase, at times.

 

The Organ Fantasia in F minor, K.608  is a highly chromatic and often dissonant piece

written for an oversized "music box on a timer" at Count Josef Deym's wax museum in

Vienna. The particular "scene" for which this piece was written is unknown.

 

Considering how the piece sounds, coupled with the fact that it was written for a music box

(or mechanical organ), the piece could be called "An Ode to Technology" or "The Machine

Speaks".

We know that Mozart had an interest in the technology of pianos and other musical

instruments. He wasn't very impressed with the sound of Count Deym's little music boxes,

but he might have been impressed with their technology and the future possibilities of

technology in general.

 

The many 4-note turns in the piece remind one of a spring being wound, as would

presumably have been necessary for the machine to play the music.

 

At the 3rd and 4th measures from the end (measures 219 and 220), the right hand plays

every note in the 12-tone scale, one at a time, but not in "sequence". It is an interesting bit

of information since it could be a symbolic statement of chromaticism itself at the end of a

highly chromatic piece.

 

In other words, Mozart may be saying something like this:

"Throughout this piece you have heard a great deal of chromaticism. Now I will give

you the entire (chromatic) 12-tone scale in 2 measures, one note at a time, as a kind

of musical metaphor for this piece."

 

If the ears didn't catch it, the analysis will:  Mozart hit every note of the 12-tone scale in

measures 219 - 220, in the short space of 5 beats. 

 

There are other aspects to this 25-note phrase which are interesting to speculate about,

but which unfortunately slide into the weird and bizarre. However, let us remember that

composing for a mechanical device is a rather strange situation - but one that Mozart accepted,

and that we may analyze and speculate about.

 

An interesting aspect of this 25-note phrase is its lack of Mozartian melody - but then,

the entire piece is also lacking in typical Mozartian melody. While K.608 is an immensely

powerful, majestic, and complex piece, it is also a somewhat "cold" and "mechanical" piece,

possibly in keeping with the fact that Mozart was writing for a mechanical organ. K.594

and K.616, also written for the mechanical organ,  have at least *some* melody and

warmth to them.  K.608 is lean on Mozartian melody - at least for the first and last

movements - and has no warmth in those two movements.

 

The first and last movements may stand alone in the Mozartian literature as the only music

Mozart wrote with little or no warmth, feeling, "humanity", personality, or memorable melody.

They feel filled with power and intellect but devoid of "feelings of the heart".

While some "machines" in modern times may engender feelings of affection, this piece of

machinery remains cool, aloof, remote, and indifferent.

It is a vision of a superior being with a brilliant and powerful mind, but with no evidence

of a conscience or the "milk of human kindness".

 

Adding to its non-human nature is the fact that it's unplayable by a human being since it was

apparently written in 4 staves. It can only be played by some kind of machine, or 2 organists or

pianists - not by an individual person. (Many recordings of this piece have been made by

individual performers, but it seems impossible that all the notes were played).

 

So, the 25-note phrase at the end of the piece summarizes 2 aspects of the piece:

1. The chromaticism of the piece.

2. The machine-like nature of the piece and its lack of normal Mozartian melody. 

 

To expand on point number 2 above, the 25-note phrase might be partially saying, "I'm a

brilliant and powerful machine. Why would you expect me to play a piece that sounds as

if it were written by a mere human with melodies that humans can relate to? The recap

may be tuneless to you, but it represents who I am. Be satisfied that I have entertained

you with my vast intellect. Now go away." 

 

Another interpretation might be this: There's a hint of brainlessness in the 25-note phrase,

as if the machine might have been saying, "You told me to hit all 12 notes of the scale in

this recap, and I did. What did you expect? A Bach Invention? If you have any

complaints, take them to the management. I just follow orders."

 

Such an attitude reminds one of an idiot savant, and Mozart MIGHT have been trying to

portray that image in the 25-note phrase. And an "idiot savant" is probably a reasonable

description of the music box when programmed with Mozart's music.

With the 25-note phrase, Mozart might have been saying, "I'm the savant; the machine

is the idiot. Just look at what happened when I cut it loose in this 25-note recap... It hit

all the notes in the 12-tone scale as I told it to do, but it forgot to create a good melody."

 

For that matter, the fact that Mozart was writing this majestic piece for a machine may

have given him a loophole to write music so awesome that the average music listener

wouldn't be able to appreciate it. He may have viewed this as a great composing opportunity

since he had the "plausible deniability" excuse  of being able to say that it was written for

a machine - not for a person to play, and perhaps not for most people to appreciate.

So, if they couldn't appreciate it, he could always say "It's just machine music - not normal

music...", concealing the fact that he apparently put all of his intellect into composing this

incredible piece.  And what grand music it is!

 

 

 

 

From the Bärenreiter score, "Drei Stücke für die Orgel".

Arranged by Friedrich Brinkmann

                         K.608, measures 219 - 221

                   K608--12-Tones-Piano     K608--12-Tones-Organ

                           Click to hear sound clips

 

 

                         K.608: measures 219 - 220.3

                         25-note Phrase Near the End

 

 

  m219                                                m220

  1             2            3            4           1            2          3

  Ab-C--E--G    F--Ab-D--F   Eb-Gb-B--D   C-Eb-A--C   Bb-Db-F#-A   G-Bb-E-G   F 

  Ab-C--E--G    F--Ab-D--F   Eb-Gb-B--D   C-Eb-A--C   Bb-Db-F#-A   G-Bb-E-G   F 

 

 

        The 12-tone chromatic scale

 

  A--Bb-B--C--Db-D--Eb-E--F--Gb-G--Ab     

  A--Bb-B--C--Db-D--Eb-E--F--Gb-G--Ab     

 

            K.608 near the end of the piece: The 12-tone scale in a 25-note phrase

 

 

If Mozart could create a 25-note musical metaphor apparently summarizing a piece, he could

certainly create a 2-chord, 6-note phrase to be used as his trademark, if he so desired. 

Mozart not only expressed his thoughts and emotions with music, he expressed his music

with musical symbols, as in the example above, making some of his music "symbols of music".

 

 

Copyright ©  2002, David E. Morton

 

Contact: Dmorton965 at aol.com

 

Previous Page       Home